why was the gettysburg address so short

\"\"

On Thursday, the
Harrisburg Patriot-News. How long, you ask? Try about 150 years. Indeed, as the Harrisburg Patriot-News Harrisburg Patriot Union, it recalled how it had panned President Lincoln s legendary Gettysburg Address, dismissing his words as silly remarks deserving a veil of oblivion. Now, its editorial board proclaims: In the fullness of time, we have come to a different conclusion. No mere utterance, then or now, could do justice to the soaring heights of language Mr. Lincoln reached that day. It goes without saying that this piece is composed in a very tongue-in-cheek fashion. Of course, it is equally true that the Gettysburg Address really is worthy of praise and attention. What are the secrets of its enduring power? Its backstory is legend among Civil War and presidential buffs alike. A little more than four months after the Battle of Gettysburg left nearly 8,000 soldiers dead and more than 38,000 others wounded, captured, or missing, Lincoln was invited to deliver a few appropriate remarks at the ceremony consecrating the creation of the Gettysburg National Cemetery. Instead of being the featured speaker, however, Lincoln was asked to deliver brief dedicatory remarks to follow a much longer address by Edward Everett, a renowned orator with a long career as a Whig Party elder statesman. Of course, despite speaking for 60 times the duration allotted to the president, Everett s deliberately neoclassical speech (though well received) has been forgotten by all but the most dedicated scholars, while Lincoln s brief afterthoughts have been immortalized as the Gettysburg Address. Indeed, even Everett himself later wrote Lincoln that, I should be glad if I could flatter myself that I came as near to the central idea of the occasion, in two hours, as you did in two minutes. There is also the quality of the prose itself. Read it aloud and hear how easily it rolls off the tongue, at once sorrowful and yet, at the same time, doggedly hopeful.

\"\"

As a self-educated man trained in the literary style of the Bible and Shakespearean plays, Lincoln had a knack for capturing with immortal eloquence ideas that lesser writers have reduced to the thuddingly prosaic. Just look at the opening line, which captures the central fact of our national origin story in 30 words most American schoolchildren can recite by heart: Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. While this single sentence comprises less than one ninth of the total text, it establishes the prevailing theme of the entire address, providing the premise to which everything else in the speech directly or implicitly refers. When Lincoln introduces the great civil war, he frames it as a test over whether that nation, or any nation so conceived in liberty and so dedicated, can long endure. The men who fought and died at Gettysburg are cast as those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. Their sacrifice must never be forgotten, Lincoln intones, because those still alive must shoulder the responsibility to carry on the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced, namely, that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. Just as the prose is beautiful, so too is the structure practically perfect. At no point does the speech ever lose sight not merely of the tragedy of the Gettysburg bloodshed, but of the higher cause for which its soldiers fought. Finally, there is the accessibility of the speech itself. Particularly in today s sound bite driven era, it s hard to imagine a verbose elegy (such as Everett s speech) being particularly resonant today. Even the best known modern presidential speeches are usually recalled based on a single catchy line: The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

\"\"

Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country. Yes we can! Yet, the Gettysburg Address seems almost entirely to be comprised of those types of pithy sentiments. Like a great poem or theatrical monologue, its individual quotes feel tightly interwoven with the whole, making it almost impossible to extract even a single line without feeling the presence of the others pressing against your consciousness. In short, if you have a couple of free minutes today, take the time to pay tribute to one of the. Gerald Shuster is a University of Pittsburgh political communication professor. He spoke to the Trib regarding the rhetorical strengths of President Abraham Lincoln s Gettysburg Address, which marks its 150th anniversary on Tuesday. Q: Is the key to this speech s power the fact that it packs so much punch using so few words? A: Yeah, it s the brevity and the effectiveness of the 270 words. That it was kind of impromptu, yet still so rhetorically effective and inspirational, makes it all the more amazing. You know, hardly anyone ever talks about the speaker who preceded Lincoln (former U. S. Sen. Edward Everett), because whatever he delivered in the (two-hour speech) wasn t anything of significance. But this rhetoric of Lincoln s was direct. He called upon God, he called upon the memory of people and (their) patriotism and the service (they) provided. The speech had the impact that it did because of the choice of words, Lincoln s slow and deliberate style of delivery and his ability to target the tone and mood of the audience for that occasion. Q: Could you elaborate on Lincoln s choice of words? What made them special? A: He was able to look at the audience and not (be) macabre even though they say the stench of death was still very much apparent when he gave that speech. His rhetoric parallels both patriotic appeal and religious appeal. (He noted) the (burial) ground is dedicated not so much because people died there, but because they fought for a cause.

He didn t say БdiedБ; he said people Бgave their last full measure of devotion. Б He mentions a nation Бunder God,Б much like current presidents do when they conclude their really important speeches with БGod Bless the United States of America. Б Q: Was the Бunder GodБ reference common (for presidents) at the time? A: No. Remember, they were working hard to remove religion from government focus. They were sticking literally to the Constitution. Q: Is it safe to call the Gettysburg Address the most well-known and influential speech in American history? A: I think there would be little doubt about that. There have been many good public addresses by presidents and others. But perhaps the only other ones that come close to (the Gettysburg Address) are (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt s Day of Infamy speech and (John Kennedy s) inaugural address. But if there s any speech that the average person knows, if you gave them a couple of lines from it, it s the Gettysburg Address. I doubt there s any other speech out there that if you gave people a few lines from it, they could easily identify it. Q: One of the more famous lines in the address is, БThe world will little note, nor long remember what we say here. Б That obviously turned out not to be the case. Do you think Lincoln was clueless that he had crafted such an enduring speech? A: I think he probably meant that this was so important, but however important it is to us today, people are not likely to remember it tomorrow. That s kind of standard in human nature Б no matter how important something is, other things will become more important down the road. (That line) was kind of a prophecy that didn t come true, thank goodness. Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media (412-320-7857 or ).

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close